| ▲ | sciencesama 4 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
But what will break the clock ? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> what will break the clock ? So unlike money-market funds, these private-credit funds can gate withdrawals and extend and pretend by turning cash coupons into PIKs. So I don't actually see credit concerns directly driving liquidity issues for the banks that didn't hold the risk on their balance sheet glares Germanically. Instead, I think the contagion risk is psychological. Which is an unsatisfying answer. But if there are massive losses on e.g. DBIP and DB USA halts withdrawals, then the 2% stock loss Morgan Stanley suffered when it capped withdrawals [1] could become a bigger issue. [1] https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/stock-market-today-dow-sp-5... | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | themgt 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
As Buffett said, "only when the tide goes out do you learn who has been swimming naked" - luckily, skimming the news, there's no obvious huge exogenous macroeconomic shocks on the horizon that could cause "the tide to go out" so to speak, so everything should be ok for now. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||