Remix.run Logo
ChrisArchitect 7 hours ago

Related:

Iran warns U.S. tech firms could become targets as war expands

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47341007

trhway 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Well, time to dust off anti-drone defense systems. Today on NPR they talked that Iran plans to launch drones from ships into California.

https://www.10news.com/news/local-news/authorities-warn-of-p...

Fox News drone expert:

https://nypost.com/2026/03/11/us-news/iran-could-use-drones-...

RobertoG 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

'Drones from ships into California' is just a psi-op for manufacturing consent. This is not our first rodeo. By now, we should know how things work.

It's not in the strategic interest of Iran to do that, and they have been very strategic and rational. It's the Americans who have abandoned rationality. The Iranian goal is very clear: they don't want to sign an agreement and be attacked again in three months or one year.

In order to get that, they want a new security framework in its part of the world. They want Israel to suffer so its population think two times before doing this again. And they want to create enough economic pain to punish the current USA administration, again to teach a lesson.

Go beyond CNN or Fox News, listen to what the Iranians are saying (1).

1- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNZ_nta8NRM

trhway 2 hours ago | parent [-]

> The Iranian goal is very clear: they don't want to sign an agreement and be attacked again in three months or one year.

Yes, of course they want to continue to do what they've been doing and not be attacked for that. Yet it is just not possible. Iran's current regime overall main goal is the spread of Islamic Revolution. Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis - these are typical metastasis of that spread. Terrorist acts, highly visible ones, is one of the effective tools of such a spread, and that way the terrorist acts are rational in the minds of Iran's regime and their above mentioned metastatic followers. There is no security framework possible which would still allow such a spread.

RobertoG 2 hours ago | parent [-]

There is little evidence of what you say. On the other hand, there is a country in the region that it's using any excuse that it find to expand itself to great cost to the civil population there.

Anyway, it's kind of funny that the USA have military posts more than 7000 miles away from its borders, but the danger of 'expansionism' is from Iran.

We are in a fantasy propaganda land where Iran is attacked in the middle of negotiations and is Iran the guilty party. How many people have to die in those USA wars? I mean, enough is enough.

trhway 23 minutes ago | parent [-]

>There is little evidence of what you say. ... but the danger of 'expansionism' is from Iran.

if you aren't familiar with Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis - i highly recommend reading on it, even if just in Wikipedia.

>How many people have to die in those USA wars? I mean, enough is enough.

I think most important isn'h how many, the most important is who. Iran's regime has just indiscriminately killed 20-30K innocent civilians and uncountable many have been tortured. That is a crime against humanity. So, the top of Iran's regime and its IRGC has to be punished. I'm fine with that punishment being US and Israel's missiles.

4ggr0 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Fox News [...] expert [...] nypost.com

surely a New York Post article quoting a Fox News "expert" will be factual, unbiased and not at all an attempt to pour more oil into the fire and manufacture consent to bomb a couple more girl's schools.

botanical 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Sounds like justification for a false flag operation by the US government. How would they transport these massive things and launch them on a different continent? That, or the US is trying to justify that this illegal war is on their doorstep and need to expand their terror.

vintermann 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

"Reichstag fire" attempts are definitively a legitimate concern. But as Ukraine has demonstrated, all you need to get a drone army deep into a country attacking you is a regular shipping container.

lewispollard 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The drones Iran are using are actually relatively small, you can fit 5 of them into a medium sized truck and they can launch in-situ, which is how they've been using them in ground operations. Doesn't seem that much of a stretch to put a bunch of them into shipping containers.

5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]
SyneRyder 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

We never did find out what those drones in New Jersey in 2024 were, did we? One Republican congressman seemed convinced at the time that he'd been informed:

BBC: Mystery New Jersey drones not from Iranian 'mothership' - Pentagon

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crrwz91wqd9o

It's certainly a theory / narrative that keeps appearing in the media.

heavyset_go 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

They were flying over military installations, if they were anyone else's drones, they would have been shot down like the weather balloons that spook the government from time to time.

drumhead 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

They were Palantir apparently.

notenlish 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I feel like that's not realistic, why would they launch drones to California rather than some place like DC or NY. It's a long distance.

I don't even think they'd launch drones to DC either, they seem to be all in on attacking oil infrastructure as well as us bases & defense systems in the Middle East, rather than America.

shiroiuma 6 hours ago | parent [-]

>why would they launch drones to California rather than some place like DC or NY. It's a long distance.

Because they allegedly have a ship already in the Pacific loaded with drones.

DC and NY are way too far from Iran to launch any kind of attack; the only attack they can possibly do is from a ship, and ships can be anyplace where there's deep enough water.

riffraff 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> Iran plans to launch drones from ships into California

That does not make any sense to me. Does Iran have a bunch of ships in the Pacific? Why? How would they even got close enough to the US coast without being noticed at this point?

I'm not saying it's not true, I just don't understand.

bawolff 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

If they were going to do it, it would probably look a lot like Ukraine's spiderweb attack.

However if they were going/able to do it, they probably wouldn't warn everyone and ruin the element of surprise, they would just do it.

saaaaaam 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I’ve been seeing stuff saying China is a big customer of Iranian oil, so maybe there are oil tankers heading to China from Iran. No idea if that is actually the case though. I wonder if that Flexport shipping map that was shared here recently has any info?

pazimzadeh 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yeah that makes no sense. only thing I've heard is they have connections to some cartels in south america. venezuela is gone but I suppose they could hire some local talent and get close enough?

Seems like a really dumb idea right now, unless maybe as a last resort if Trump decides to drop tactical nukes or something

6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]