> Then you should have no issue with people using LLMs to communicate more clearly.

My raw thought: I wonder how many people are really objecting to the loss of exclusivity of their status derived from their relative eloquence in internet forums. When everyone can effectively communicate their ideas, those who had the exclusive skill lose their advantage. Now their core ideas have to improve.

Same idea, LLM-assisted: I wonder how many objections to LLM-assisted writing really stem from protecting the status that comes with relative eloquence. When everyone can express their ideas clearly, those who relied on polished prose as a differentiator lose that edge. The conversation shifts to the quality of the underlying ideas — and not everyone wants that scrutiny.

Same ideas. Same person. One reads better. Which version do you actually object to?

I don't object to either version. I think the LLM'd version is a little clearer; I also don't think I'd peg it as LLM'd if you hadn't marked it as such.