| ▲ | degamad 7 hours ago | |
Almost the entirety of the technology world is English-speaking, not English-native. Pretending that it's English-native is why there's unspoken incentives to sound more "native", and thus use these grammar-correcting tools. Some of the intelligent comments on here come from people who learned English in recent months or years, rather than in childhood. Their English isn't always fluent or well-structured. If they rely slightly more heavily on suggested-next-word tools or AI translations, is that a reason to exclude them from the conversation? Conversely, many English learning resources for non-native speakers focus on strict formal language, similar to AI-generated text. Do we risk excluding people who have learned a style more formal than we're used to? | ||