This is going to be a tough ask. I am with this 100% for "ai generated" but not "ai edited". What if I'm using AI for spellchecking or correcting bad grammar? what if it is an accessiblity-related use case? or translation?

It's just a tool ffs! there are many issues with LLM abuse, but this sort of over-compensation is exactly the sort of stuff that makes it hard to get abuse under control.

You're still talking with a human!, there is no actual "AI" you're not talking to an actual artificial intelligence. "don't message me unless you've written it with ink, on papyrus". There is a world of difference between grammarly and an autonomous agent creating comments on its own. Specifics, context, and nuance matter.

Just came across this post on Reddit today. Seems like an effective use of the tool that's not welcome here.

https://reddit.com/r/tea/comments/1rqwy31/i_am_a_former_guid...

Are people really so helplessly dependent on LLMs they can't post on a damn forum without asking the LLM for permission...