| ▲ | floxy 10 hours ago |
| Just because people get murdered doesn't mean that laws against murder are useless. Although I don't have any evidence of that. |
|
| ▲ | koolala 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Murder can be verified and caught in many ways. It is more like the 1969 Bathroom Singing Prohibition Act. |
| |
| ▲ | martey 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I think this new guideline is nothing like the Bathroom Singing Prohibition Act, because that law doesn't seem to really exist: https://www.grunge.com/1710070/is-pennsylvania-strange-batht... | | |
| ▲ | koolala 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | It is definitely like it because it can't be enforced. No one can tell if your singing in your private bathroom so a law covering that makes no sense. |
| |
| ▲ | munk-a 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | AI generated comments can also be verified and caught in many ways. I'd guess that it's statistically more likely for a murder to be resolved than a random AI comment to be detected but I'm not actually sure. There are a lot of sloppy murderers (since it's rare for an individual to have _practice_ at it) - but there are also a lot of sloppy LLMs. |
|
|
| ▲ | miltonlost 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Well the laws against murders also often have punishments/repercussions associated with them. HN guidelines? Not so much |
