The problem is that you can't just verify everything yourself. You likely have your own deadlines, and/or you want to do something more interesting than replicating statistical tests from a random paper.

▲

irishcoffee 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> The problem is that you can't just verify everything yourself.

So the problem is reduced to "I believe what I want! This person said it and so I think it's true!"

Sounds like politics in a nutshell.

▲

cyberax 2 hours ago | parent [-]

No, it's not. It's reduced to "I trust people from a respectable scientific journal with 150 years of history".

> Sounds like politics in a nutshell.

Again, no. It sounds like the division of labor. The thing that made modern human societies possible.

▲

irishcoffee 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Division of labor. Dividing labor between the "i'll pay you to work" and "I'm paid to work"

The jokes write themselves,

	▲	cyberax 18 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Yes? What is exactly funny here? This is literally how the civilization works. I'm paid to do my work, and I pay others to do their work. Do you grow your own food and sew your own clothes? Also, did you personally etch the microprocessor that runs your computer? The division of labor inherently means trusting others. So when I buy a bag of M4 screws, I'm not going to measure each screw with a micrometer, and I'm not taking X-ray spectra to verify their material composition. The academic world also used to trust large publishers to take care to actually review papers. It appears that this trust is now misplaced. But I don't think it was somehow stupid.