I have the re-release secondhand unopened and I think I paid about that much, so even in a collector's market, not terrible at all. An expensive toy to be sure but a deeply satisfying experience if you like that kind of thing.

▲

Xerox9213 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Buying buckets of used bricks is pretty cheap, too. I bought an adult's old lifetime collection for $30 CAD. My 2 year old son and I are still sorting them.

▲

tylerflick 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Not to mention you can 3D print Duplo compatible bricks.

▲

cruffle_duffle 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Sorting Lego is such a pain in the ass. I have like a huge stash from when I was a kid. Back then we just had it all in a few tubs and dug to find a part. But somehow now I feel I must sort them… but the “right way” is ill defined and kind of sucks the joy out of playing (especially disassembling)

And there is no “right way” that I’ve even found. Sort by color and now the little pieces fall to the bottom and are hard to dig for. The best I can see is part type and size… maybe… even then it sucks out the fun. I want to build cool shit with my daughter not spend every moment of Lego time sorting. There is no joy in sorting…

Maybe I just revert back to the “big tub” approach.

I dunno. Thanks for listening to my TED talk I guess.

	▲	fifilura 3 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		The evolution of lego sorting [2001] https://news.lugnet.com/storage/?n=707 (Bah Might as well submit that as a top level story, others may enjoy it)
	▲	orthoxerox 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		Why sort by color if human eyes (unless colorblind) are great at recognizing different colors? Back when I was a kid, I used the big tub approach (with the Spyrius base octant as my shovel).
	▲	kroolik 4 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Build with what pieces you can find, rather than plan the perfect structure ahead. Improvising keeps the creativity going! Wheres fun if sorting legos sucks all the Joy from it