| ▲ | sigmar 9 hours ago | |||||||
I've got no idea who codewall is. Is there acknowledgment from McKinsey that they actually patched the issue referenced? I don't see any reference to "codewall ai" in any news article before yesterday and there's no names on the site. | ||||||||
| ▲ | rzmmm 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Yeah can't find much information either. I would like to see at least some proof. Either via Mckinsey or from the security team. | ||||||||
| ▲ | 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
| [deleted] | ||||||||
| ▲ | darkport 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
We’re pretty new! :) They didn’t want to provide comment on our post but they did offer comment via The Register. | ||||||||
| ▲ | doron 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
it is weird isn't it? The register article implies that it's acknowledged by McKinsey- https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/09/mckinsey_ai_chatbot_h... Edit: Apparently, this is the CEO https://github.com/eth0izzle | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | eisa01 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
If it's true that there's 58k users in the dump, that would mean former employees are in the dump I assume that means McKinsey would need to disclose it, or at least alert the former employees of the breach? | ||||||||
| ▲ | philipwhiuk 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
There's a responsible disclosure timeline at the bottom indicating they'd all been fixed. | ||||||||