| ▲ | DeepSeaTortoise an hour ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
You can never just use existing resources as long as those end up in places they're no longer accessible to the market anymore. Cash just about never sits just around as long as whoever holds onto it has no current need for extremely liquid assets. Like insurances. I doubt that the ratio of cash that ends up bound up that way to the one that doesn't changes a lot overall. The real problem to UBI is governments creating income via debt, IMO. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | zozbot234 an hour ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> The real problem to UBI is governments creating income via debt, IMO. The national debt is just a hidden tax on future generations. You're stealing resources from the future (by selling claims to them in advance, that's what national debt is) and spending them in the present. It's justifiable in extreme cases like a war (or perhaps for massive public investments that can't be funded within the existing budget - which is actually not that common), but really not otherwise. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||