This is just ai slop. If you follow what the actual designers of Claude/GPT tell you it flys in the face of building out over engineered harnesses for agents.

▲

throwaway7783 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I agree with this. There is not a lot of harnesses/wrapping needed for Claude Code.

	▲	canadiantim 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		You don't need a harness beyond Claude Code, but honestly it's foolish to think you shouldn't be building out extra skills to help your workflow. A TDD skill that does red-green-refactoring is using Claude Code exactly as how it's meant to be used. They pioneered skills.

▲

canadiantim 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Works better than standard claude / gpt, which doesn't do red-green-refactor. Doesn't seem like slop when it meaningfully changes the results for the better, consistently. Really is a game-changer. You should consider trying it.

▲

nojito 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I do do TDD but using skills in this way is an anti-pattern for a multitude of reasons.

	▲	canadiantim 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I don't think just saying it's an anti-pattern for a multitude of reasons and then not naming any is sufficiently going to convince anyone it's an anti-pattern. This is in fact precisely what skills is meant for and is the opposite of an anti-pattern, but more like best practice now. It's explicitly using the skills framework precisely how it was meant to be used.