| ▲ | cmiles74 6 hours ago | |
A weekly ops meeting where they talk about ensuring PRs with AI contributions get extra scrutiny? I think that's significant news. | ||
| ▲ | osigurdson 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Exactly. This is real world pushback on the "software is solved" narrative from AI labs. Also, most orgs try to copy Amazon for some reason more than big tech firms. "At our org, we disagree and commit" - yeah you made that one up yourself. Anyway, this is going to have a lot of impact in my view. | ||
| ▲ | cobolcomesback 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
There was nothing mentioned in the meeting or messaging about PRs with AI contributions. There are no extra requirements for review or scrutiny of AI-generated-code. The media reports about this have been excessively misleading about this. | ||
| ▲ | falsemyrmidon 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
It's not extra scrutiny. Doing code reviews for every commit is a standard practice at Amazon and has been for a decade plus. | ||