> He edited his reply to me multiple times...

I got the sense from your reply that some extra clarity would be beneficial.

> This is unnecessary. OP came out with "AUTHOR IS INSANE" even on the most generous of interpretations.

I did not actually call the author insane, I called their decision to explicitly disallow testing insane. It's an insane decision. I am not _literally_ calling the author insane.

▲

oraphalous 2 hours ago | parent [-]

> I did not actually call the author insane...

If you think this distinction really matters wrt the point I'm trying to make, then it's time for you and I to bug out conversationally. Sometimes two individuals have such different ways of communicating that the pain of exegesis isn't worth the squeeze. No hard feelings. I'm sure 50% responsibility is at least mine, but it's not going to be worth it for either of us figuring out exactly what.

	▲	maplant 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I'm not really arguing with your point, I'm correcting your incorrect description of what I'm saying. To argue with your actual point: I don't really care about the overall context, actively disallowing tests in a codebase is a _bad decision_. Look how it worked out for them. > it's time for you and I to bug out conversationally Fine with me
	▲	2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[deleted]