| ▲ | snoren 4 hours ago | |
>The real issue is that the social contract is broken because LLM output is attempted to be passed off as human work. I don’t think writing with AI makes a creation "worse." If anything, it makes it better, if you bring genuine idea and imagination to it first. The stigma comes from people being lazy and letting the AI do the heavy lifting of thinking. That’s where the "social contract" breaks. But using AI as a multiplier for your own voice and ideas isn’t "subpar"—it’s efficient. If we start playing "whack-a-mole" with punctuation to find AI, we’re missing the point. The question isn’t what tool was used, but how much of the human's "creation" is actually in there. | ||
| ▲ | orthogonal_cube 3 hours ago | parent [-] | |
> The stigma comes from people being lazy and letting the AI do the heavy lifting of thinking. This is essentially my point. The AI emits an answer and people will, in turn, copy and paste the result as-is. It’s a repeat all over again of people simply copy-pasting something from Wikipedia and trying to pass it off as their own. | ||