| ▲ | neya 6 hours ago | |||||||
Here's a better idea: Eradicate requirement of the most personal details of someone to do basic tasks...such as using a web application. Unless it's a government organisation, no private provider should have the ability to use or process people's identities. It's too much power in one entity's hands. I wish someone would actually solve this instead of yet another ID solutions. We all saw how a literal job seeking app (LinkedIn) abused this. | ||||||||
| ▲ | rosasalberto 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
We actually agree with the core concern. Right now the internet has a terrible model where every company asks for your ID and stores it themselves. That means your identity data ends up scattered across dozens of databases. We think the future is privacy-preserving identity and reusability: verify once, keep your identity in your own wallet, and only share minimal proofs (e.g. “over 18” or “real human”) instead of your full identity every time. That’s the direction we’re building toward with SSI / identity wallets and reusable verification. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | yuppiepuppie 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Id say this is a valid criticism of the b2c market (esp. for social networks). but there still is a viable b2b market where kyb/c is not as intrusive - and sometimes a regulatory requirement (finance, health, etc.). | ||||||||
| ▲ | mothballed 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
These 'identity verification' companies end up becoming a main enemy of this pursuit. Their own revenue relies on legislation that assures their existence. | ||||||||