| ▲ | short_sells_poo 2 hours ago | |||||||
> We, agentic coders, can easily enough fork their project And this is why eventually you are likely to run the artisanal coders who tend to do most of the true innovation out of the room. Because by and large, agentic coders don't contribute, they make their own fork which nobody else is interested in because it is personalized to them and the code quality is questionable at best. Eventually, I'm sure LLM code quality will catch up, but the ease with which an existing codebase can be forked and slightly tuned, instead of contributing to the original, is a double edged sword. | ||||||||
| ▲ | geoffmunn 37 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
"make their own fork which nobody else is interested in because it is personalized to them" Isn't that literally how open-source works, and why there's so many Linux distros? Code quality is a subjective term as well, I feel like everyone dunking on AI coding is a defensive reaction - over time this will become an entirely acceptable concept. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | sanderjd 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Maybe! Or maybe there is really a competitive advantage to "artisanal" coding. Personally, I would not currently expect a fork of RedoxOS that is AI-implemented to become more popular than RedoxOS itself. | ||||||||