Remix.run Logo
10xDev 4 hours ago

The fact that models aren't continually updating seems more like a feature. I want to know the model is exactly the same as it was the last time I used it. Any new information it needs can be stored in its context window or stored in a file to read the next it needs to access it.

jnd-cz 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Unless you use your oen local models then you don't even know when OpenAI or Anthropic tweaked the model less or more. One week it's a version x, next week it's a version y. Just like your operating system is continuously evolving with smaller patches of specific apps to whole new kernel version and new OS release.

10xDev 4 minutes ago | parent [-]

There is a huge gap between a model continuously updating itself and weekly patches by a specialist team. The former would make things unpredictable.

kergonath 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> The fact that models aren't continually updating seems more like a feature.

I think this is true to some extent: we like our tools to be predictable. But we’ve already made one jump by going from deterministic programs to stochastic models. I am sure the moment a self-evolutive AI shows up that clears the "useful enough" threshold we’ll make that jump as well.

10xDev a minute ago | parent [-]

Stochastic and being unpredictable are two different things. I would claim models are rather predictable even if it is not as predictable as a deterministic program.