| ▲ | Muromec 3 hours ago | |||||||||||||
This sounds complicated in theory, but it's easier in practice. Potential long time contributor is somebody who was already asking annoying questions in the irc channel for a few months and helped with other stuff before shooting off th e PR. If the PR is the first time you hear from a person -- that's pretty drive-by ish. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | DrewADesign 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Sounds like a better way to make sure you have to be part of a clique to get your changed reviewed. I’ve been a long-time bug fixer in a few projects over the years without participating in IRC. I like the software and want it you work, but have no interest in conversing about it at that level, especially when I was conversing about software constantly at work. I always provided well-documented PRs with a narrow scope and an obvious purpose. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | MadameMinty 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
Why would I ask annoying questions when I can identify, reproduce, pinpoint the bug, locate it in code, and fix it? Doing it alone should make it clear I don't need to ask to understand it. And why would I be interested in small talk? Doubt many people are when they patch up their work tools. It's a dispassionate kind of kindness. Not to mention LLMs can be annoying, too. Demand this, and you'll only be inviting bots to pester devs on IRC. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||