| ▲ | Someone 2 hours ago | |
One could also try to use a different set of definitions better suited to such a visualization. The Oxford Advanced Learner’s dictionary has an appendix called “Defining Vocabulary”. It says: “In order to make the dictionary definitions easy to understand, we have written them using only the words in the following list. […] Occasionally it has been necessary to use in a definition a word not in the list. When such a word occurs it is shown in SMALL CAPITAL LETTERS.” I estimate that list has about 3,500 words. ⇒ If you base your network on that dictionary or one carefully constructed like that, the graph could have a central core of about 3,500 nodes with the other words circling around it. Making a good visualization still would be a challenge, of course. | ||