| ▲ | weird-eye-issue 4 hours ago | |
I think you're just hallucinating because this does not come across as an AI article | ||
| ▲ | lovecg 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
I see quite a few: “what X actually is” “the X reality check” Overuse of “real” and “genuine”: > The real story is actually in the article. … And the real issue for Cursor … They have real "brand awareness", and they are genuinely better than the cheaper open weights models - for now at least. It's a real conundrum for them. > … - these are genuinely massive expenses that dwarf inference costs. This style just screams “Claude” to me. | ||
| ▲ | hansvm 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
It was almost certainly at least heavily edited with one. Ignoring the content, every single thing about the structure and style screams LLM. | ||
| ▲ | lelanthran 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
> I think you're just hallucinating because this does not come across as an AI article It has enough tells in the correct frequency for me to consider it more than 50% generated. | ||
| ▲ | NetOpWibby 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Name checks out | ||