Cite one legal case where an AI company trained on a particular work, and the judge ruled that they quote-stole it-unquote.

▲

kdheiwns 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Courts pretty much always rule in favor of rich corps that steal from individuals, and increasingly so. AI companies have money. Artists don't. That makes AI thievery fine, doubly so since AI corps have financially contributed to the government.

	▲	JAlexoid 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		You should realize that this is happening not only in the space of images(where conglomerates aren't a thing), but also in music. Music conglomerates have money and their lawsuits will probably settle the issue.(unless they settle) That will be applied for all copyrighted works, regardless of the medium. I believe going against the big guys is the reason why the big ones don't yet have music generation LLMs.