Remix.run Logo
HolyLampshade 2 hours ago

200 kW/rack is absolutely insane to me. The power consumption of these facilities is just...ridiculous.

ineedasername 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

With respect to consumption, it’s pretty efficient vs older traditional servers, though I know workloads like that aren’t completely fungible. Nonetheless it bears keeping in mind that a single GB200 NVL72 rack provides 1.4 ExaFLOPS of AI compute (at FP4 precision, ideal circumstances, but this is envelope math all around). So it’s power efficient, for what it is.

HolyLampshade 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Oh, I have no doubt it is functionally efficient. I'm just amazed given the system deployments I've been party to, and the tiny amount of per rack energy usage comparatively speaking given the functionality of those systems.

Like, what in the good god damn are we using all this energy for?

bayarearefugee an hour ago | parent [-]

> Like, what in the good god damn are we using all this energy for?

Bad AI porn, terrible AI music, AI scams and completely devastating the labor market.

And based on the recent Anthropic/Pentagon rift... I guess also creating autonomous kill-bots and doing mass surveillance.

Just a bunch of super cool stuff.

Aurornis 33 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The compute power is also ridiculous.

Some of the reason for the high density is that you need devices physically close to each other to share such bandwidth. It’s not because we’re limited by the physical building space, because we can construct buildings all day long. Sending bits around at ultra high speed is hard and you need to keep all of the devices physically close to avoid having your interconnect costs explode.

Bombthecat 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Since you and me and everyone else will foot the elecricy bill. Energy consumption or efficiency is not a concern.

dylan604 an hour ago | parent [-]

It's the water use that concerns me