>that they feed to original code into a tool which they setup to make a copy of it

Well, no. They fed the spec (test cases, etc) into a tool which made a new program matching the spec. This is not a copy of the original code.

But also this feels like arguing over the color of the iceberg while the titanic sinks. If you have a tool that can make code to spec, what is the value in source code anymore? Even if your app is closed-source, you can just tell claude to write new code that does the same thing.

▲

timeinput 39 minutes ago | parent [-]

Blanchard fed the spec to the tool, and Anthropic fed the code to the tool, so Blanchard didn't do anything wrong, and Anthropic didn't do anything wrong. Nothing to see here.

	▲	foresto 4 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		> Blanchard fed the spec to the tool, Yes... > and Anthropic fed the code to the tool, Presumably, as part of the massive amount of open-source code that must have been fed in to train their model. > so Blanchard didn't do anything wrong, and Anthropic didn't do anything wrong. Nothing to see here. This is meant as irony, right?