Remix.run Logo
PessimalDecimal 3 days ago

You probably mean necromancy.

jacquesm 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

> You probably mean necromancy.

I probably did not. Then I would have written that. They are fucking over the dead. They are clearly not communicating with the dead.

bigstrat2003 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

"fucking over" as an expression has nothing to do with sex, so it wouldn't qualify as necrophilia.

jacquesm 2 days ago | parent [-]

Neither does digital. Is it pedant day today or did I miss the memo?

mynameisvlad 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

What's with the excessively hostile attitude? That's more of a Reddit thing than a semi-professional discussion site that has this as a guideline:

> Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes.

jacquesm 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

> What's with the excessively hostile attitude? That's more of a Reddit thing than a semi-professional discussion site that has this as a guideline:

>> Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes.

Which part was snarky, excessively hostile or unprofessional?

mynameisvlad 3 days ago | parent [-]

The beginning, middle and end.

jacquesm 3 days ago | parent [-]

So, in the interest of 'curious discourse' how would you suggest I should have written my comment so that it would be more professional, less snarky and less hostile?

You see, the comment that I replied to made an assumption, that assumption is embedded in the word 'probably'. The person that wrote that presumes to know what I intend. I corrected that. Clarified it and moved on. If that seems hostile and snarky to you then I'm happy to be educated. For myself, I think the comment I replied to could have been phrased as a question rather than a statement.

Your comment strikes me as a bit snarky too by the way.

mynameisvlad 2 days ago | parent [-]

> You probably mean necromancy.

You:

> I probably did not. Then I would have written that. They are fucking over the dead. They are clearly not communicating with the dead.

A less snarky and hostile version:

> I actually didn't! I specifically meant that they are fucking over the dead.

Pretty much the same content, and it makes you sound like you actually want to interact with other people. Even in your paragraph long explanation you do quite a few things that are just unnecessarily hostile. It's clearly just the way you talk, but it also doesn't mean you shouldn't work on improving it.

> For myself, I think the comment I replied to could have been phrased as a question rather than a statement.

Then you should have (politely) said it.

jacquesm 2 days ago | parent [-]

Thank you. I'm 60+ and I think I'm past saving, but I appreciate your effort to tone police HN.

As well as your own exemplary behavior:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46653114

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45505708

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45334298

And probably others besides.

AlexeyBelov 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

As an outside observer: mynameisvlad is right, and even provided a better variation of your comment _which you requested_. To me this is an OK criticism, I'd like to see more of this on HN. Then you've thrown everythign in the trash, essentially, and started digging through their comment history. Their comment wasn't even under discussion. I'd like to see less of this on HN.

mynameisvlad 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

[flagged]

jacquesm 2 days ago | parent [-]

Hi Vlad,

Turnabout is fair play, you should know that by now. You seem to have the idea up your bonnet that you are in a position to lecture, that sort of thing is best done from a position of maturity. Your incessant attacks are far more against the spirit of HN than anything that I've written in this thread.

Your criticism does not take into account anything beyond the first layer of what I've written and does not apply leeway for cultural or other differences, which you seem to want to flatten to 'whatever Vlad says' being the norm.

Your intolerance is the problem here, not my writing. I asked you because I wanted you to have a chance to clarify your view before criticizing you because that's only fair. It could well be that you had an actual reason besides having long toes.

I don't like to be lectured by those that have ethics issues themselves on ethics and I don't like to be lectured on the tone of my writing by those that have issues themselves with the tone of their own writing.

For someone who has been here for as long as you have I'd expect a more balanced view on the contributors to HN and a much better contribution:flagged comments ratio than you seem to rack up.

If you really want to improve the tone on HN by reducing hostility, snark, unprofessionalism and now personal attacks then I suggest you seek out a mirror. Your own behavior in this thread shows examples of all of those and you are neither a credit to yourself or your employer.

2 days ago | parent [-]
[deleted]
dolebirchwood 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

He's not hostile; he's Dutch.

mynameisvlad 2 days ago | parent [-]

That's no excuse. Dutch people still have to communicate with others.

wetpaws 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]