| ▲ | kjksf an hour ago | |
We did in fact say so. https://www.carltonfields.com/insights/publications/2025/no-... > No Copyright Protection for AI-Assisted Creations: Thaler v. Perlmutter > A recent key judicial development on this topic occurred when the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review the case of Thaler v. Perlmutter on March 2, 2026, effectively upholding lower court rulings that AI-generated works lacking human authorship are not eligible for copyright protection under U.S. law | ||
| ▲ | pseudalopex an hour ago | parent [-] | |
> > A recent key judicial development on this topic occurred when the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review the case of Thaler v. Perlmutter on March 2, 2026, effectively upholding lower court rulings that AI-generated works lacking human authorship are not eligible for copyright protection under U.S. law This was AI summary? Those words were not in the article. The courts said Thaler could not have copyright because he refused to list himself as an author. | ||