| ▲ | 0x3f 6 hours ago | |||||||
There's a big difference in when you break silence though. Strategically, much better to keep it until all the facts are known to your side. At the start, the police/government have the informational advantage. In other countries, even delaying (but eventually speaking) can allow a negative inference to be drawn. The right to silence is important even if you eventually speak. | ||||||||
| ▲ | pclmulqdq 6 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
The correct way to interact with the American legal system is never to talk at all unless you have a written immunity deal. Kids should learn to say "no questions/searches" and "slide the warrant under the door" from their parents. | ||||||||
| ||||||||