I'm not sure what Iran having nukes does other than change the power dynamics in the Middle East to one where Israel can't bomb civilians with such impunity...

North Korea and Pakistan has nukes.

▲

lwansbrough 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I think most people in the middle east will tell you that Iran acquiring nuclear weapons is bad. As I'm sure you're aware, they are a major supporter of terrorist organizations.

▲

whycombigator 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I'm aware that the present is informed by the past. 1953, like 1979, being a year in the past.

Discussing what terrorism is, in this context, is rather complicated. Especially speaking as a Brit, and knowing rather a lot of other dates, such as 1917.

▲

lwansbrough 2 hours ago | parent [-]

It shouldn't be that complicated to acknowledge that Iran's proxies are about as cut and dry terrorists as they come.

	▲	whycombigator 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		It's surprising how many things that you would think are "cut and dried" are apparently in fact not "cut and dried", although granted it's much easier to identify instances that stray to one side of a boundary rather than another. For example, the idea that bombing civilians is a war.