| |
| ▲ | pzo 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | what stops us to use the same naming and call it USA Regime, Israeli Regime at this point? | | |
| ▲ | tgma 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Nothing stops you, but I suppose murdering tens of thousands of your own people is a fairly clear delineation that you are not a singular entity? | | |
| ▲ | pzo 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | if for you to be qualified as regime is to murder tens of thousands of your own people then I think you put too high bar on it. I guess killing only few thousands or even few hundreds in your definition would rule out to someone being called totalitarian/autocratic regimes? How about not murdering own people but thousands other people? How is it called? Nazi germany AFAIK mostly murdered millions of other people. People use this name (Regime) wrong - worth to at least read definion on wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regime | | |
| ▲ | tgma 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Look, I don't understand what you are debating here. I already agreed you can call USA regime just that should you choose to. I don't mind. You might get a scholarship to Columbia while at it. My post was simply to clarify to the reader that PressTV is owned by the regime in Iran. |
| |
| ▲ | whycombigator 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Give it time... |
|
| |
| ▲ | watwut 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I am afraid that this will bring them closer together. That the people who would welcome outside world to do a magical thing that reforms Iran wont like the practical thing the world actually did. By afraid I am not saying it will happen, it is not a prediction. I think that it is a risk. | | |
| ▲ | tgma 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | After they killed 40k+ in Jan? Perhaps. | | |
| ▲ | orwin 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Every weeks that number increases. Two weeks ago it was 30k, a week ago it was 35k, now it's 40k+, but OSINT sources keep the number around 15k (including 1.3 k from the Iranian government own forces) and don't move it up. I'm pretty sure the real number is higher than the one OSINT resources can give, considering the uprising and repression also happened in small, less connected cities, but the constant increase is honestly very off-putting, and the more it happens, the more it feels like manufacturing consent. | | |
| ▲ | tgma 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | There have been numbers as high as 90k reported initially, so I wouldn't say it is "moving up" across time but across sources. There is no clear data, but at this point 30-32k appears to be the lower bound estimate over which there's a consensus. Likely to be higher. |
| |
| ▲ | kakacik 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Current campaigns will kill way more iranians. Plus regime didn't bomb 200 girls to pieces in their school, did it. Thats extremely hard sell, with cherry on top when you have a literal video of tomahawks hitting that area during that time and trump claiming it was iranians who bombed it... just spits and insults in the face | | |
| ▲ | tgma 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | > Current campaigns will kill way more iranians. Your math is not mathing. 30-40k in 2 days unarmed civilians vs I dunno 6k almost all military in a week? If you look at the stats of executions etc you'll see civilian casualties in Iran go DOWN while being bombed. > regime didn't bomb 200 girls to pieces in their school, did it. Yes, actually they did. It was their own missile. Just like the Ukrainian plane they shot down a few years back. | | |
| ▲ | kakacik 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I said will, please read comments more thoroughly before replying. Everybody agrees this war will drag for some time. Care to backup those wild claims with any facts? The video of tomahawk I talk about is circulating all over internet, so its pretty uphill battle to discredit it when clearly tomahawks are landing | | |
| ▲ | tgma 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Trump himself confirmed this on Air Force One earlier today. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2026/03/07/trump-... Nothing about this is such a wild claim if you are familiar with their past behavior. There were Persian language sources inside Iran that immediately after the incident attributed it to IRGC missile misfire, before some outlets started using that as propaganda material (which by the way played out perfectly.) | | |
| ▲ | pzo 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | It's ridiculous to say "Trump himself confirmed this" as reliable source of truth. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | MrBuddyCasino 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | What do you think the New York Times or CNN is (or rather, were). | | |
| ▲ | tgma 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Varies. Not all of them are equal. At least not in the same way. Distinctions are important. NYT, for example, employs Farnaz Fassihi who's a known regime shill.
CNN recently sent a reporter live to the region who has to operate under the regime's restrictions to be let in and cannot accurately report everything even if they wanted to. Same with Reuters who has an office inside. They basically had a choice to bite the bullet and agree to the terms and be one of the few foreign reporters with access, or not have access at all and freely report. That said, PressTV is different from the above a it's an officially a state-operated entity, so it is not a question of mere bias. |
|
|
