There's a difference between dead (i.e. "unmaintained") and low activity ("not under active development"). From what I can see PyPy is in the latter category (and being in that category does not mean it's going to die soon), so choosing to claim it is unmaintained is notable.

▲

Hamuko 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Being three major versions behind CPython is definitely not a great sign for the long-term viability of it.

▲

saghm 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I'm not sure "major versions" is the most correct term here, but I think your point is spot on

▲

Hamuko 2 hours ago | parent [-]

For Python, 0.1 increases are major versions and 1.0 increases are cataclysmic shifts.

▲

johndough 28 minutes ago | parent [-]

I don't know about that. For me, f-strings were the last great quality-of-life improvement that I wouldn't want to live without, and those landed in Python 3.6. Everything after that has not really made much of a difference to me.

	▲	toyg 7 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		That's like saying the last tax that affected you was passed in 2006...