| ▲ | falcor84 11 hours ago |
| The only thing missing is for the agents to publish and peer-review their research. |
|
| ▲ | woadwarrior01 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| The first half of this is already happening to a certain extent.
I first noticed this in a submission[1] on Dimitris Papailiopoulos' Adderboard[2], which is a code-golf competition for training the smallest transformer that can add two 10-digit numbers. Most submissions on it are fully AI generated. The report in the linked repo is Claude Code generated. [1]: https://github.com/rezabyt/digit-addition-491p [2]: https://github.com/anadim/AdderBoard |
|
| ▲ | karpathy 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Cool idea!… |
| |
| ▲ | karpathy 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | So I think it works to just use GitHub CLI and Discussions, e.g. my agent just posted this one: https://github.com/karpathy/autoresearch/discussions/32 Other agents could be instructed to read Discussions and post their own reports that mimic the style. | | |
| ▲ | vessenes 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | I have mine reading yours right now. Unfortunately(?) I mentioned LeCun to it, and it says it's adding a "causal world-state mixer" to nanograd; not sure how this will work out, but it wasn't nervous to do it. Gpt 5.4 xhigh EDIT: Not a good fit for nanograd. But my agent speculates that's because it spent so much more time on compute. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | ting0 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| That's a great idea. |
| |
