| ▲ | Paracompact 4 hours ago |
| Grade school has never been kind to genuine writers. It reminds me of SAT essays that favored formulaic writing, because guess what: the grading criteria were formulaic! I think grading in general can be stymying for students' motivation and creative drives. |
|
| ▲ | idontwantthis 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I had fun with those because they only care about the quality of the writing not the content so I would make sure that none of my facts or references were real. |
|
| ▲ | Onavo 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Being able to write in a formulaic manner is a skill though. Not being able to write properly is not great for communication. |
| |
| ▲ | Paracompact an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | There was nothing useful about the particular formula they were teaching. It wouldn't even be useful for a bureaucrat. It only tested how well you knew the formula, how confidently you simplified inherently nuanced topics, and how lucky you got that the random underpaid SAT grader (usually a teacher looking for a pittance of extra cash) thought your essay fit the rubrics they were given. Good riddance to the thing. | |
| ▲ | carcabob 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | True. Writing structures for arguments and analysis make a huge difference in effective writing. I wish brevity and linguistic precision were taught more, as well. Miscommunication due to ambiguity is one of the biggest causes I see for confusion or heated arguments. |
|