Remix.run Logo
forrestthewoods 6 hours ago

Windows is an order of magnitude better in this regard.

vanviegen 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It used to be, but only in cases where your distro doesn't just package whatever software you require. Nowadays I prefer Flatpak or AppImage over crappy custom Windows installers for those cases. They allow for sandboxing and reliable updating/deinstallation.

skydhash 5 hours ago | parent [-]

These days, I equate anything that ships via docker/flatpak first as built by someone that only care about their own computer, especially if the project is opensource. As soon as a library or a tool update, they usually rush to add a hard condition on it for no reason other than to be on the "bleeding edge".

robmusial 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

And yet I'm constantly getting asked when we'll support Windows containers at my office.

avsm 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

We've given up on native Windows containers in OCaml after trying to use them for our CI builds for many years. See https://www.tunbury.org/2026/02/19/obuilder-hcs/ for our recent switch to HCS instead. Compared to Linux containers, they're very much a second-class citizen in the Microsoft worldview of Docker.

forrestthewoods 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

This is because your team doesn’t know how to ship software without using containers.

If you have adopted a bad tool then people are likely to want the bad tool in more places. This is the opposite of a virtuous cycle and is a horrible form of tech debt.