| ▲ | scarecrowbob 2 hours ago | |
I've found that reading odds and ends outside of my own academic, professional, or theoretical interests nets some interesting things sometimes. At one point I got curious about how the US military thinks about insurgencies, so I read their manual on how to fight them. As someone holding a lot of dissident views in the US it was pretty interesting. One thing I took away was the feeling that at no time did the manual ever define what an "insurgent" is, beyond whoever the US government tells them the insurgents are. So you have as situation where, ultimately, there's no external reality testing, and reality is simply whatever "reality" is as defined by the command structure. I know that sounds overly simple- of course military follows a chain of command, unquestionable right up to its civilian commander in chief. Why I feel that is a useful observation is that, to your question, people are constantly deferring their ethical judgements. And I suspect there is some cognitive bias in play that allows folks to feel that deferral can't happen across all these systems. In the case of businesses, it is to "the market"-- which is reactive and as such doesn't have "judgement", and even if it did it's needs aren't "human" so relying on it as a human seems dangerous. So to your question, my answer is usually "probably not". And further, unless people stop deferring their judgments to the imaginary of the spectacular market, eventually shits gonna break. In the case of the military, we can see what happens when radically nihilistic (pedophilic and sociopathic media personalities) are put at the helm. My larger point, though, is that our usual assumption seems to be that all these other folks are likely to exercise their faculties to test out reality and hopefully, when it doesn't line up with that reality, push back and prevent dumb shit from happening. But all these systems are set up to prevent that from happening, it doesn't seem at all strange to me that these systems are starting to break in the ways that the seem to be failing. | ||