| ▲ | stego-tech 2 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
Hot take, but I don’t think it should recover. If anything, I think a combination of low unemployment, higher wages, and a labor force participation rate of ~45-55% would be a sweet spot to aim for: * It would indicate more single income households able to make ends meet and live higher quality lives * It would suggest more stay-at-home parents to rear children, which is only possible in a safe and stable economic environment * It’d also suggest a higher amount of community engagement, rather than mere working and resting. * A rise in successful single-income households would also suggest improvements in cost of living affordability In our current world, where we expect both parents to work full-time jobs to survive (because the cost of everything assumes a married couple employed full-time, especially in cities), this number is bad; in a healthier society, it might be a good thing. I’d argue in favor of deflating costs or raising wages instead of increasing labor force participation, but that’s my personal soapbox. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | 22 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
| [deleted] | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | chrisweekly an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I love this vision. What do you think might be required to make it real? | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||