| ▲ | sneak 6 hours ago | |
Why the nonfree AGPL? Are you seriously worried that someone is going to fork this and make money with it, given that anyone else could vibe code another one in a few hours? | ||
| ▲ | yjftsjthsd-h an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |
> Why the nonfree AGPL? By no reasonable definition is AGPL nonfree. It isn't a permissive license, but it's libre, gratis, and open source. > given that anyone else could vibe code another one in a few hours? If that's true, then who cares? | ||
| ▲ | koiueo 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
1. Why do you ask? Do you intend forking and making money out of it? 2. Why are you lying about AGPL being nonfree? As far as I'm concerned, it is free as in free speech for me as a user. This was the initial goal of the GPL. The freedom of the end user is the main value of the GPL family of licenses. So serious question: why are you lying? Is it intentional, or due to your lack of understanding? | ||