| ▲ | c0m4r 5 hours ago | |
I got your point. The project structure remains from the initial phase of building the tool. I think I'll eventually remove it or put it on the wiki or somewhere else. My excessive attachment to copyright probably stems from the fact that years ago, when I wrote my own websites and articles, people often simply copied them and signed them as their own. The Linux Foundation website has attribution instructions that ask for the use of the ® symbol; I simply followed this instruction, but I agree that it's probably an exaggeration on my part. Considering what this tool does, I personally think it's lightweight in terms of both binary size, execution times, and dashboard performance. But I agree that's debatable. | ||
| ▲ | dqv an hour ago | parent [-] | |
In fact, you followed the instructions exactly to spec https://www.linuxfoundation.org/legal/the-linux-mark | ||