| ▲ | gte525u 6 hours ago | |
We used it for a new Defense/Aerospace projects. Language-wise it's fine although verbose. Intent was to separate similar IP so there was no claim of cross contamination. Built-in threading and a robust standard library is nice. Tool-wise - refactoring was a bit of a pain. | ||
| ▲ | ajxs 4 hours ago | parent [-] | |
> Tool-wise - refactoring was a bit of a pain. Could you share what tools you were using, and what you felt was missing? I write Ada in vscode, because it's what I use in my dayjob. AdaCore's plugin has good language support^1, but I don't use it for much other than formatting, or expect sophisticated automated refactoring functionality from it. ^1: It's still missing support for some Ada202x features. I can't wait for it to support `return when...`. | ||