| ▲ | senko 12 hours ago | |
That's still light years better than Slack. The thing lags a few seconds while typing a message on a 20 core 128g ram machine. That's with their desktop (electron) app. Mercifully, the web app works better. Still, CC blows it out of water. Slack is that bad. | ||
| ▲ | quesera 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Something important must be different about our Slack environments. Maybe it's the number of users, or possibly the OS? We're a small company (about 150 Slack users), and I've run the Slack (Electron) app on a 16GB M2 (macOS) and a 4GB Chromebook (running a non-ChromeOS Linux), and it has never had any noteworthy performance issues. It still sucks, but not because of performance. | ||
| ▲ | troupo 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
How is it "light years better than Slack"? It's a terminal wrapper for Anthropic API. It somehow baloons to 68 gigabytes when all it needs to do is call an APi and slowly draw a few hundred characters on screen. And they can't even do that without flickering. Oh yes, and until very recently it would also consume a significant percentage of CPU just waiting for input to a slash command. Yes, on that same 20 core 128g RAM machine. You surely must be kidding. Slack is an amazing cutting edge high performance tech in comparison as it has about two orders of magnitude more features that a TUI API wrapper. | ||
| ▲ | theshackleford 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
your instance does that. Mine does no such thing and I don’t know anyone for whom it does. Not to say it doesn’t, but it’s clearly not a universal issue. | ||