| ▲ | kube-system 6 hours ago | |
Anti-Tivoization is a pretty radical idea that restricts the rights of hardware developers for the benefit of software developers. Linus doesn't really care about strong-arming hardware developers the way RMS does. He just cares about the software. | ||
| ▲ | hn_acker 37 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
> Anti-Tivoization is a pretty radical idea that restricts the rights of hardware developers for the benefit of software developers. How does anti-tivoization restrict the rights of hardware developers, considering that hardware developers can choose not to pre-install anti-tivoization-licensed/contracted software? Is it anti-tivoization that restricts the rights of hardware developers, or does copyright law do that? | ||
| ▲ | gzread 42 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |
The entire GPL is a radical idea that restricts the rights of software developers for the benefit of software users. | ||