To alarmists both arguments are valid - just use whichever one is more convincing to the person you're talking to. The objective is stop using fossil fuels no matter what.

Im not sure what is this type of debate good for.

▲

triceratops 12 hours ago | parent [-]

What "both" arguments are so-called alarmists using? What's an alarmist, exactly?

And yes, the objective is to stop using fossil fuels. That's not exactly a secret agenda, it's the whole fucking point.

▲

t0bia_s 11 hours ago | parent [-]

What is denier, exactly?

Seriously, there is no debate with this rethoric.

▲

triceratops 11 hours ago | parent [-]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change_denial

You didn't answer either of my questions. Even though I asked first.

▲

t0bia_s 10 hours ago | parent [-]

You missing the point, again.

	▲	triceratops 8 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Do you have a point? Please communicate better. I may well be speaking to a bot.