Got it, it's cooler, no one needs AC. Next question, why are there a lot more heat deaths per capita. I mean, a lot more (4/million vs 235/million)

Should be simple

▲

test001only 11 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Could be lot of reason. Older European cities with high-density stone buildings and less green space often trap heat more effectively than typical U.S. suburban layouts. Europe has a larger proportion of elderly residents (aged 80+), who are the most susceptible to heat stress. You just picked a data and are trying to fit your narrative on top of it without really considering all possible aspects.

	▲	vladvasiliu 11 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> Older European cities with high-density stone buildings and less green space often trap heat more effectively than typical U.S. suburban layouts. Doesn't that mean that they would need AC, then? At least for those specific buildings. However, as a European living in Paris, one of the densest cities in the world, I only feel the need for AC like 2-3 weeks a year. I think the issue is that most people dying of heath are already very old and much more sensitive to it. But if you live in any kind of share building, you can't just go and set up a split. If it is outside the building, you need permits, both from the architects, so that you don't deface your ugly concrete building, and from your fellow residents, who usually vote "no" by default.
	▲	bko 10 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		You make a lot of great points. You know what would be great for helping those elderly residence prone to heat strokes living in high-density stone buildings with less green space? Air conditioners! In face, I think EU should mandate air conditioners in every home.

▲

beepbooptheory 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Because 'global warming has accelerated significantly'?

	▲	wilg 11 hours ago \| parent [-]
		then it wouldnt be cooler would it