> I’m of the opinion that direct air capture is the primary escape hatch we have for not hitting 3 or even 4C warming in the next 100-200 years

Why is it always never 'burn less fossil fuels'.

Anything but the oil company bottom line huh?

▲

wing-_-nuts 17 hours ago | parent | next [-]

We could cease burning all fossil fuels tomorrow and we'd still have to resort to geoengineering. Read the IPCC projections. All of the ones that keep us below 3c require 'negative emissions'. That's code for DAC, a technology that we've only ever deployed to small pilot projects, deployed more widely, more quickly, than we've deployed any technology ever.

TLDR: We're gonna have to use sulfate injection until we can transition our economy

	▲	zargon 16 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Yes. And if we don't also stop burning fossil fuels then we'll never even break even.

▲

culi 17 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

nobody will champion degrowth because it means less profits