| ▲ | pinkmuffinere 14 hours ago | |
My impression is that flying on a commercial plane produces less CO2 than driving? So if your only options are drive vs fly, I think flying is the correct choice -- is that right? | ||
| ▲ | zaken 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
It's about 60 mpg per passenger to fly domestically and 90 mpg per passenger to fly internationally. If you have a family of 4, you can think of it as the equivalent of a 15 mpg vehicle for domestic flight and 22 mpg vehicle for international flight. So somewhere in the range of a full-size pickup truck. But -- when you fly, you go very far. If you go on vacation to Hawaii from San Francisco once a year with your family, that's the equivalent of driving a Ford F-150 for 5000 miles. If you visit India or China that's 15,000 Ford F-150 miles! In a single trip, more than what most people drive in an entire year! So you can make a big difference just preferring local vacations instead of remote ones. | ||
| ▲ | tgsovlerkhgsel 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
It's code for "don't travel, especially long distance"... because most people would simply not be willing to make many trips if the trips took as long as the non-flight option would require. | ||
| ▲ | 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
| [deleted] | ||