| ▲ | 01100011 14 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What about solar shades? Seems like a relatively quick and easy way to regulate solar input. It's nice too because you can quickly remove it if necessary. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | tremon 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
How long would a single cargo-load of shades have to be operational just to offset the amount of CO2 emitted by its launch? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | teamonkey 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What percentage of the 128-million-square-km cross-sectional area of the earth are you proposing to shade? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ACCount37 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Only becomes viable if you have things like Starship online and fully operational, with launch rates at the level of Falcon 9 today. At the minimum. Still a more viable option than bringing greenhouse gas emissions into the negatives globally, by the way. But that's a low bar. Nuking the ocean floor is probably a better call. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | post-it 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reducing sunlight to the surface means we lose solar power effectiveness and we need to use more power for artificial lighting to grow plants. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||