"Preprints and early-stage research may not have been peer reviewed yet."

I have a paper that says Global Warming is not real (Also not peer reviewed)

There is a vast peer reviewed literature that points in the same direction. Getting hung up on how this has not yet been peer reviewed is just bizarre.

▲

jacquesm 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Are you going for a record in bad takes? Your account is a month old and yet I recognize it on sight for the bs takes. Try a bit harder please.

▲

small_model 13 hours ago | parent [-]

My point is until it's peer reviewed it offers no value. Do you know how many papers are published that don't pass peer review?

	▲	lostlogin 4 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		The peer review of your comment appears to disagree.
	▲	jacquesm 12 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		> My point is until it's peer reviewed it offers no value. That's just your opinion. It clearly has some value, whether or not it will have even more remains to be seen.