If it is too late to do anything, why should we care? We can’t reverse it, so why should we care about slow down?

wing-_-nuts 15 hours ago | parent | next [-]

This is like punching a hole in your wall and saying 'there's already a hole, why shouldn't I just demolish my entire house'

	▲	cryptoegorophy 9 hours ago \| parent [-]
		No. It is like punching a hole in your wall when something else punches the wall daily with increased rate. No matter what you do at this point the wall will be destroyed.

▲

kergonath 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

We must limit the problem, then adapt and mitigate. Some damage is irreversible, it does not mean that it’s a good idea to stop trying to understand what will happen. You don’t stop weather forecasts when a hurricane touches land just because it’s going to happen anyway.

Reality is not binary. There’s a whole spectrum of situations between "everything gets back to normal and all is well" (which was never on the cards after the 1980s) and "all humans die within a century". And the nuances in between still affect billions of people.

	▲	cryptoegorophy 9 hours ago \| parent [-]
		From what I understood we are closer to the “all humans will die within a century” and if this is the case then what’s the point of doing anything? Does it matter if our effort just delays the “all humans will die” by let say 50 years? Radical change we need to do if we are serious is going back to caves. 0 consumption. I highly doubt anyone will do that.