This makes sense - they are demonstrating the capability of their core product by doing so? They dont make browsers, c compilers, they sell ai + dev tools.

▲

jdiff 17 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Seems like a poor advertisement for their product if their shining example of utility is a broken compiler that doesn't function as the README indicates.

▲

gehsty 15 hours ago | parent [-]

Impressive that it made a c compiler though? Or do we judge all programmers by their documentation now?

	▲	agentultra an hour ago \| parent [-]
		All it took was all the C compilers they could scrape into their training set. It’s not impressive in the sense that it’s doing what it was designed to. It just happens that it generated a C compiler that kind of worked. Someone came by later and used more AI on it to make it closer to a production grade C compiler like gcc/clang. Saying, “it made a C compiler,” is not specific enough.

▲

delfinom 17 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Capability of a product that makes non-working outputs at a premium?

I can hire an intern for that.

	▲	gehsty 15 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Will cost you a lot more ;)