| ▲ | vova_hn2 8 hours ago | |
> I did not feel that I knew the codebase enough to be able to actually assess the correctness of the change. > I want to do good engineering, not produce slop, but for 1 min of prompting, 5 mins of tidying, and 30 mins of review, we might save 2 days of eng time. I don't really understand where do "2 days of engineering time" come from. What exactly would prevent someone who does know the codebase do "1 min of prompting, 5 mins of tidying, and 30 mins of review" but then actually understand if changes make sense or not? More general question: why do so many slopposters act like they are the only ones who have access to a genAI tool? Trust me, I also have access to all this stuff, so if I wanted to read a bunch of LLM-slop I could easily go and prompt it myself, there is no need to send it to me. Related link: https://claytonwramsey.com/blog/prompt/ (hn discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43888803 ) | ||