| ▲ | globemaster99 17 hours ago |
| So much for freedom and democracy lectured by Americans and westerners to the rest of the world. This is just censorship of every form of freedom of speech. This got nothing to do with children or youth. They will eventually censor and track everyone. |
|
| ▲ | wao0uuno 15 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I feel the same way. Looks like online "privacy" and "anonymity" will cease to exist within our lifetime. It's already starting with those "privacy respecting" solutions like zero trust age verification but that will quickly be deemed insufficient and because the legal framework will be already present it will very quickly and smoothly turn into full blown surveillance and censorship.
Time to setup I2P on my server and donate some bandwidth but I'm sure they'll make that illegal too. |
| |
| ▲ | globemaster99 12 hours ago | parent [-] | | True.Like many other nefarious things British started this with child protection act, which got nothing to do with children, considering their long history of pedophiles. Slowly all the other governments using the same pretext and template. Time to use pigeons and own peer to peer communication. |
|
|
| ▲ | gzread 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| If you don't want to be censored just don't check the checkbox that says "this device is for a child, please censor adult content"? There's no passport check in the CA/CO law, in fact it's expressly forbidden. |
| |
| ▲ | nickslaughter02 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | > It can get worse. New York’s proposed Senate Bill S8102A requires adults to prove they’re adults to use a computer, exercise bike, smart watch, or car if the device is internet enabled with app ecosystems. The bill explicitly forbids self-reporting and leaves the allowed methods to regulations written by the Attorney General. | | |
| ▲ | gzread 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Interesting that everyone is labelling things not for sale in CA/CO but nobody is labelling them not for sale in NY. | | |
| ▲ | iamnothere 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | I don’t think they have processed the NY law yet. It is completely incompatible with the open source model. When people finally figure it out there will be an uproar. |
| |
| ▲ | pacifika 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Select your location, if NY etc. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | user3939382 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Next step coming soon is “well we need a license scan if you tell the OS you’re over 18”. macOS already requires a 6 step process to “trust” regular programs not from their app store. So this is just end to end control of our machines. |
| |
| ▲ | hellojesus 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Yes. Soon ISPs will require hardware based remote attlestations to prove you haven't modified any software that wants to send or receive packets through them. | |
| ▲ | Aachen 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | You mean a dedicated license that proves the holder is over 18, separate from your identity such that it's not usable for tracking or identity theft when the verification platform gets hacked? |
|