| |
| ▲ | mrs6969 18 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | 100 is my answer. Exactly my question to you: What is your percentage to say no lets do not take actions. Because again; with this perspective every single action is legitimate. There is a chance for everything. If there is a weapon that can kill every human on the planet, every country will race to invent it because every country will try to invent it. Every action is valid. Every weapon development is okey, because if you dont, others will. You can kill everyone, because everyone might eventually try to kill you, there is always a chance. | |
| ▲ | laserlight 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I don't get the point. What does objectivity have to do with the value of x? Your example seems to validate my point of view: warmongers disguise their subjectivity by basing their actions on “objective” models. | | |
| ▲ | qsera 12 hours ago | parent [-] | | >What does objectivity have to do with the value of x? It does not have anything to do with objectivity. I thought it to be futile to discuss that since, as you implied, predicting future can't be 100% objective, and thus decisions to avert a bad future outcome always need to be based on subjective decisions. So this is another question where I want to ask you how you would make a subjective call. | | |
| ▲ | laserlight 12 hours ago | parent [-] | | Got it. Looks like we're on the same page. Everyone makes a subjective call. | | |
| ▲ | qsera 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yes, we are on the same page, and you have got one question to answer. Make your call. |
|
|
|
|
